01.01.70

Trustworthy emboldened few Ghanaians have emerged from the woods, vociferously defending the routine of gayness in Africa in general, and Ghana in particular. They have advanced well-researched reasons why Ghana should harmonize with to the orders unilaterally issued by the British Prime Minister David Cameron and the US President Barack Obama friendly Ghana to adhere to gay rights. Ghana will suffer the withdrawal of exotic aid that our Finance Ministers over the years have factored into our annual budget announcement as a major component of revenue without which the budget is never complete. These Ghanaian advocates dwelling abroad have convincingly advanced both historical and evolutionary reasons in weather of compelling Ghana openly embrace homosexuality. How ironic that is.

What I make allowance for as incongruous behaviour by these advocates is the fact that they have allowed confrontational Immaculate supremacy or Black inferiority complexities to threaten or contaminate their own African values. They seem to assume the opinion that Ghanaians always have to do according as requested or suggested by the superior Fair-skinned contemporary. Ghana, to them, should act in uniformity with the Whites on their acceptable social vices but sad to relate far removed from their technological parameter. Could believing anything coming from "the White is precisely" idea not have clouded their mind's eye and thinking vision? Could what I see as their erroneous way of assessment probably not the truth in the end? The historical argument advanced to buttress their contention that gayness is make right and that Ghanaians have to uphold it is born out of the fact that homosexuality has existed since the days of the biblical Lot, in the end resulting in the Sodom and Gomorrah episode? They also claim lesbianism has existed among our Ghanaian female students since the introduction of Boarding Extra and Tertiary education.

Source: Modern Ghana