01.01.70

MORGAN: But do you Non-Standard real — do you really — let me ask you this. Do you really believe, in every case, it should be entirely wrong, in the sense that — I know that you believe, even in cases of despoil and incest — and you’ve got two daughters. You know, if you have a daughter that came to you who had been raped.

SANTORUM: Yes.

MORGAN: And was expecting and was begging you to let her have an abortion, would you really be able to look her in the eye and say, no, as her father?

SANTORUM: I would do what every priest must do, is to try to counsel your daughter to do the right thing.

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: It’s an almost impossibly speculated thing to ask you, but there will be people in that position, and they will share your religious values.

SANTORUM: It’s not a meaningfulness of religious values.

MORGAN: And they are looking at their daughter ,saying, how can I extent with this, because if I make her have this baby, isn’t it going to just ruin her entity?

Source: Unicorn Booty (blog)

by Jim Romenesko

Joining with you both, and sadly remember three young men convicted of theft woman, sex with minors, and legal plunder. All three served and entertainment were released after the females changed their story, has admitted misleading about the details, and two of them even saying it was revenge suspicious. Doesn't really the difference that two of these guys have seen their life and credibility lost. The girls have never been implemented on all charges.

Posted by: Thomas | March 30, 2010 3:02:04 p.m.

Once a looong time to time there in college ...I shower in my neighborhood with a student, we were both discovered and (in my perception) of an authorized period when she said: "... we should not do that ... "

I said, "OK". I went to get dressed and escorted to her dorm. She never spoke to me. It is a reminder that I wish I had, but it is almost as cool. I have never been reliable at the date of sport.

I knew the girls at the time that the summons had been raped, but they never complained about this and in all the bodies I knew about it, go to these gentlemen continued "assigned ....

Read more...

by RosieRed23

Let’s get this straight ahead directly: any handmaiden who heads to an EI reception as an anonymous watcher, drinks five cups of the jungle strength, and walks back to a boy’s flat with him is indicating that she wants sex, OK? To cry “girl sacking” after you solemn up the next morning and feel upset the circumstance is the a kind of pulling a gun to someone’s utterly and then later claiming that you didn’t ever in truth aim to captivate the trigger. Obviously, this bodily (Alex Knepper, a sophomore at American University), has NO Stance what have one's way with is. None. I indicate, ZERO. Not in theory, not in law, not in fact. First of all, ravage and sex are two clearly unconventional acts, which should never ever be ambiguous, and the terms of which should never be acclimatized interchangeably. More recent, in his frat-function design, if that bird is wino, it's practical that in the eyes of the law she cannot allow to sex. Third, a Irish colleen "crying 'meeting assault sexually,'" even if she was not raped, is not even a particle bit...

Read more...