01.01.70
Romney succeeded in his labour to evade scrutiny about whether he shares the far-out views of his party's base on lineage control,abortion and gay civil rights. Those are topics he really doesn't be to talk about.
But the rest of us should not let Romney and the other candidates off the hook so easily. We should be vocal about exposing the GOP's compete to turn back the clock.
Just 50 years ago people in Connecticut were arrested, fined and sentenced to reform school for distributing birth control to married couples.
Forty-five years ago a Massachusetts man was prosecuted and imprisoned over the affirm's quaint "Crimes Against Chastity" statute for exhibiting and providing extraction control to an unmarried woman.
The Supreme Court put an end to these violations of individual franchise. In 1965, in Griswold v. Connecticut, the court ruled that there was a marital repair to privacy embedded in the Bill of Rights that bars states from banning contraception. That morality to privacy is the foundation for Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision guaranteeing a maidservant's legal right to abortion. In 1972, in Eisenstadt v.
Source: Women's eNews